A
non-governmental organisation, Centre for
Social Justice (CSJ)
has called for the retention of
Section 17 of the Principal Act
in the proposed amendment,
as contained in a Memorandum
entitled, "Finance Bill 2020 and
the Public Procurement Act Of
2007, submitted by Centre for
Social Justice Limited by Guarantee to National Assembly lawmakers and Journalists, a copy
made available to Business Pioneer.
The centre also, frowned at the
move to amend 12 Acts of the
National Assembly with just one
Act of 39 pages, saying the
competences and expertise required to attend to the subjects
covered by these laws are too
wide to be considered in just one
amendment bill.
Addressing newsmen in
Abuja recently, the lead director,
Centre for Social Justice, Eze
Onyekpere explained that there
was only one government, one
Ministry of Finance and procurement needed to reflect the
arms of government.
According to him, creating
second level approving authorities in the Federal Executive
Council for the Executive, National Assembly Tender's Board
for the Legislature and National
Judicial Council Tender's Board
for the judiciary runs counter to
best practices.
In it justification, the lead director cited Nigeria's Country
Procurement Assessment Report June 2000 which warned
against such move.
According to the report, once
a law on public procurement has
been enacted and regulations,
manuals and standard bidding
document issued carrying out
public procurement including
contract awards will clearly be
an administrative function, the
mechanics of which should be
disengaged from the executive.
The report noted, "currently,
high level politicians such as
Governors, Ministers, and Commissioners are operationally involved in the procurement process. It pointed out that under
the reformed procurement system, high level politicians should
maintained their overall managerial oversight responsibilities
while leaving administrative and
operational matters (including
procurement) to the civil servants.
Onyekpere said " when this
recommendation is juxtaposed
with the intended amendment, it
becomes quite easy to assert that
this amendment is not in line with
best practices.
The CSJ boss maintained that
the implication of continuing of
this new path may lead to a situation where the Nigerian President or the Chief Justice of Nigeria would be cited for procurement fraud.
Section 17 of the Principal Act
stated: "subject to the monetary
and prior review thresholds for
procurements in his Act as may
from time to time be determined
by the council, the following shall be the approving authority
for the conduct of public procurement: (a) in the case of (1)
a government agency,
parastatal or corporation, a
parastatals Tender Board and
(11) a Ministry or extra -ministerial entity, the Ministerial
Tender board.
The Finance Bill 2020 seeks
to amend the Capital Gains Act,
Companies Income Tax Act
Tertiary Education Trust Fund
(Establishment Act , Customs
and Excise Tariff, etc, (Consolidated ) Act, Value Added Tax
Act, Federal Inland Revenue
Service (Establishment) Act,
Nigeria Export Processing
Zone Act, Oil and Gas Export
Free Zone Act, Fiscal Responsibility Act, Companies and
Allied Matters Act and the
Public Procurement Act.
Onyekpere maintained that
it was simply too ambitious to
propose to amend 12 Acts of
the National Assembly with
just one Act of 39 pages, pointing out that competences and
expertise required to attend to
the subjects covered by these
laws are too wide to be considered in just one amendment
bill.
He said, "these laws are too
fundamental to our economic
management to contemplate
amending them in a hurry.
They require due contemplation, deep consultations with
stakeholders and their presentation and consideration as
single bill that would be considered with their merits. Lumping them together serves no
useful purpose. Hence, the issues contained in this bill be
considered separately.
Onyekpere added.
0 Comments
No Comment Posted